Jump to content

Shveicar

Country Rep
  • Content count

    134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Shveicar last won the day on March 8

Shveicar had the most liked content!

About Shveicar

  • Rank
    Hot Rhenium

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

559 profile views
  1. Chinese 'partners'

    What these meaningless skirmishes? It is obvious that at this stage, the earn who buys and sells. Those who keep WDC or investment in the it just lose money. This is the main cause of all ills for POW coins that do not bring profit to their owners. Berzeck if you haven't seen my message, I would like to draw your attention to this offer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1506325.20 Them created to order wallets look quite professional. What do you think?
  2. If I had the money..

    Ok, I deleted the image. That would not aggravate an already sad picture. But when you soothe and are ready for a constructive dialogue, I will be happy to hear it..
  3. If I had the money..

    You should not be offended when I providing examples associated with other coins. You must understand that the majority of investors watching successful projects and tries to adapt popular technologies for their projects. For this you need to explore the market and do not sit on one place and maintain the position of no tolerance to all innovations. As I said, WDC is now under the full control of Chinese speculators. There is no progress in the system of POW. And the market demonstrates this. What do you specifically propose to do in this situation? To sit and wait for the return Berzeck and continue the same dead-end development or wait for the arrival of a new developer, which proyavit willpower and begin to conduct network reform? I will give you a simple example, note this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1506325.20 You can see how much the development for a new wallet that is fully compatible with 32 and 64 x platforms? When I proposed to reform and was willing to sacrifice some money to do this, But here for me began to say that reforms are not needed. Then You said we need a vote Chinese investors but they also silent. In the end, everything remains as it is now. Now you have to understand the impasse of the situation which is now WDC..
  4. If I had the money..

    You do not quite understand the problem. Today most of the coins uses a passive POS. This old technology is born in the depths of the PPC. But not long ago, a new system of active POS. It works almost as well as the POW system, with the difference that you do not need more video card or Asic chips. You get the reward as long as your wallet is in the active minting. If you close your wallet, you are no longer remunerated. This technology allows you to save colossal amounts of energy and has already been implemented in some coins. Do not consider it advertising, but Diamond already uses such a system. I'm sure that for this technology future. I suggest that you once again think about the changes, because the position of conservative views should go to the past..
  5. About China !

    Thank you. I'm not going disappear. I'm with here. If what, you know where to find me on https://bitcointalk.org/
  6. About China !

    I think that it is not necessary so deeply to be disappointed in WDC. If you look at coinmarketcap.com you will see that this behaviour (pumps and dumps) is inherent in all the major POW coins (Infinitecoin, Megacoin, Earthcoin, Wordlcoin, Quark) came under Chinese influence. As practice shows, even despite the damaged blockchain all these coins continue to remain in the market. Of course this is balancing on the brink of the abyss, but the invisible Chinese hand of the manipulator continues to be played with these coins P.s Perhaps someday (if such a time comes), large investors will come together and decide to revive WDC. But obviously not today.
  7. About China !

    Berzerk led the development of the wallet its own way. For example, he refused the version of Windows 32x, motivating it with the fact that soon all computers will be 64-bit. In addition, he believed that most of the modern applications on which many wallets have been created for different crypto currencies are already considered obsolete. But we see that most of the popular crypto currency has fully compatible 32 & 64-bit wallets. So what caused such a decision, for me it is not clear. I know that on Github there are plenty of available source codes from other projects, and if you want, any developer can take these codes and adapt them to launch a new project or intensive care a old. The only problem is that, without the approval of the major holders of large wallets, there is no benefit to revive the project. If such people sit in the shade and wait, refusing to communicate and engage in the discussion, it means that they'll just use your result and sell your coins when you begin to rebuild your project. It is from this, many developers just go away and they prefer to create new projects from scratch, at least they have 100% control on the new coin.
  8. About China !

    I just wanted to prove that without serious decision-making (changing the algorithm and switching to a new system), there will be no development. And it happened. We saw the same strategy Pump and dump from the Chinese, which was before. Now they have dropped their stocks of WDC and perhaps have forgotten about this coin for several years. Maybe when the price falls to 0.1 cents they will want to organize the pump again, but nobody knows. In any case, I have long sold my WDC and I do not want to dance to the tune of the Chinese puppeteers.
  9. About China !

    Hi. I think that until a strong and amicable team of investors is created, there should be no change. The Chinese community speaks its own language, only Asic mining is important for them and full control over market WDC. But I see that even they do not have a consensus.
  10. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    Ok, maybe someone saw my message and was scared, but I just wanted to find out what was going on. There is nothing more stupid than dumping all your coins in one big pile. In addition to loss, it will not bring anything..
  11. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    Then it looks very strange. This block Explorer is the main one at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/worldcoin/ did you try to contact its owner and find out what is going on?
  12. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    It seems that the WDC network has stopped. For 19 hours, not a single new block was added...
  13. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    Yes it is. But let's be objective. I'm ready to allocate 1 BTC for this (this is commensurate with my investment expectations from WDC). If other investors are interested in connecting POS and stabilizing the network (I'm counting on it), then we will be able to collect the necessary amount for financing.
  14. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    Ok, I think there is something to think about and how this can be fixed in case of code updates. Because it's very bad that LTC transactions go faster than WDC
  15. Switching block chain tech? Candidates?

    hmm.. But this is a simple mathematical calculation. 120min * 60 = 7200 sek this 7200 : 30 = 240 There is a slowdown of 240 times. And to equalize the graph, the need a compensation blocks with a time of 30: 240 = 0.125 seconds. Which is even theoretically impossible.. Look at https://www.wdcexplorer.com/ I did not see there is a single block having time less than 30 seconds For comparison, take a look at the time intervals in the LTC system http://explorer.litecoin.net/chain/Litecoin
×